• practical strategies
  • planning
  • starting tasks
  • deadlines

Practical exercises toolkit

Five research-informed tools for getting started: a two-minute start, if–then plans, helpful deadlines, breaking tasks down and a short weekly review.

By Procrastinate.ai Editorial TeamPublished Updated 4 min read

Short answer: A small set of tools covers most everyday delay: start with just two minutes, link a situation to an action with an if–then plan, use spaced deadlines, break big tasks into concrete first steps, and review your week briefly. None of these is magic, and effects in studies are typically modest to moderate, but together they make starting easier and more predictable.

This is the final lesson of the academy. In the previous lesson on productive rest you looked at recovery. Here, the ideas from the whole course come together as practical exercises you can use this week.

Why start with tools rather than motivation?

Waiting to feel motivated is one of the most common ways delay keeps going. Researchers often describe procrastination as needless, voluntary delay driven largely by feelings, and practical guides grounded in that research emphasise small actions over waiting for the right mood (Pychyl, 2013). Tools help because they reduce the number of decisions you need to make in a difficult moment.

Tool 1: How does a two-minute start work?

Commit to working on the task for just two minutes, with full permission to stop afterwards. The point is not the two minutes themselves, but getting past the moment of starting, which is often where the uncomfortable feeling is strongest. One research-informed guide sums up this strategy as "just get started" (Pychyl, 2013).

For example, a student dreading a statistics assignment might open the file and read the first question aloud. A homemaker in Kolkata planning a large family function might write three names on the guest list. If you stop after two minutes, that still counts.

Tool 2: How do I write an if–then plan?

An if–then plan links a specific situation to a specific action: "If it is 7 am and I have made my coffee, then I write for ten minutes" (Gollwitzer, 1999). Across 94 independent tests, these plans had a medium-to-large positive effect on reaching goals compared with goal intentions alone (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006).

Planning has another benefit. In one set of studies, unfinished goals tended to intrude on people's thoughts during unrelated tasks, but making a specific plan for when and how to pursue them reduced those intrusions, even before the goal was done (Masicampo & Baumeister, 2011). A plan can quiet the background nagging.

Tool 3: Do deadlines really help?

They can, especially when they are spaced out. In a classic study, students often chose to set themselves earlier deadlines, showing they knew they might delay. Self-imposed deadlines helped, but evenly spaced external deadlines helped more (Ariely & Wertenbroch, 2002). This is called precommitment: deciding in advance in a way that is hard to undo.

Practical versions include telling a colleague you will share a draft on Wednesday, booking a review slot with a friend, or splitting one big deadline into weekly checkpoints. A researcher writing a book chapter might agree to send her editor one section every Friday.

Tool 4: How do I break a task down?

Large, vague tasks are hard to start because it is unclear what to do first. Research on goal setting suggests that specific goals generally lead to better performance than vague "do your best" goals, when people have feedback, commitment and the ability to reach them (Locke & Latham, 2002).

Try asking, "What is the smallest visible action that moves this forward?" Keep going until the answer takes under fifteen minutes. "Plan the conference talk" might become "list the three points I want people to remember". The guide to starting difficult tasks has more examples.

Tool 5: What should a weekly review include?

Once a week, take ten minutes to look back and ahead. Building on the self-reflection lesson, you might ask:

  • What did I move forward, even a little?
  • Which delays were helpful (incubation or strategic postponement), and which were avoidance?
  • What feeling showed up most often before I delayed?
  • Which tool helped most, and which plan needs adjusting?
  • What is my first step for each important task next week?

Imagine a small-business owner in Lagos who notices, over three Sunday reviews, that invoices get delayed every time a client has been unhappy. Her fix is not more willpower but an if–then plan: "If I finish a difficult client call, then I send that invoice before lunch."

If you notice that avoidance stays intense or persistent despite these tools, it can sometimes be linked to things like ADHD, depression or anxiety, and a qualified health professional can help.

Key takeaways

  • Tools reduce in-the-moment decisions, which is where delay often wins.
  • A two-minute start lowers the barrier to beginning; stopping afterwards still counts.
  • If–then plans are well supported and may also quiet the nagging of unfinished goals.
  • Spaced, external deadlines tend to help more than one distant deadline.
  • Specific first steps and a short weekly review turn intentions into a steady rhythm.

Try it

The reflection exercise below walks you through building one if–then plan and a first step for a real task. Choose something that matters to you this week and keep your answers short.

You have reached the end of the academy. If you would like to revisit the foundations, return to the psychology of procrastination.

Interactive exercise · Reflection

Build your own if–then plan

Pick one real task you would like to move forward this week. These prompts help you turn it into a concrete if–then plan with a tiny first step. Short answers are perfect, and they are saved privately for you.

Choose something meaningful but not your very hardest task.

For example: open the document and write a working title.

Link it to something that already happens, like finishing breakfast or arriving at your desk.

If I sit down at my desk after lunch on Tuesday, then I will write the first line of my report.

For example: If I miss Tuesday, then I will do it after lunch on Wednesday.

Nothing you enter here is saved or sent anywhere. Sign in or create a free account to save your answers and track your progress.

Frequently asked questions

Which tool should I try first?

For most people, the two-minute start is the easiest entry point because it asks so little. Once starting feels more manageable, an if–then plan can make it more automatic.

What if I stop after two minutes every time?

That is still progress, and many people find they keep going more often than expected. If you always stop, try making the first step even smaller or more specific.

Are self-imposed deadlines worth setting?

Research suggests they help, though evenly spaced deadlines set by someone else tended to help more. Sharing your deadline with another person can give it some of that outside structure.

How long should a weekly review take?

Around ten minutes is enough. A short review you actually do each week is more useful than a long one you skip.

Sources

  1. Pychyl, T. A. (2013). Solving the Procrastination Puzzle: A Concise Guide to Strategies for Change. New York: Tarcher/Penguin.
  2. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493 (opens in a new tab)
  3. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.
  4. Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Consider it done! Plan making can eliminate the cognitive effects of unfulfilled goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 667–683.
  5. Ariely, D., & Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psychological Science, 13(3), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00441 (opens in a new tab)
  6. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705 (opens in a new tab)